ClinEvident™ · by Scientari

Clinical evidence for healthspan.
Not marketing claims.

Independent six-dimension grading of how strong the evidence really is that an intervention extends healthspan — across cardiology, metabolic, inflammation, renal, and longevity. Every grade links to published research. No affiliate bias. No hype.

12 Compounds Graded
0 Evidence Signals
6 Scoring Dimensions

The Rx–Supplement Evidence Divide

No supplement in our registry scores above C+. The highest-evidence healthspan interventions are repurposed prescription drugs. This isn't bias — it's what the published data shows.

Empagliflozin (SGLT2i)

A+
Cardiology Rx (Repurposed) kidneyscardiovascularliver

SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin) are the highest-evidence longevity compound class in the registry, with A+ grades for both…

Grade: A+

Semaglutide

A+
Metabolic Rx (Repurposed) cardiovascularkidneysbrain

Semaglutide is the highest-evidence longevity compound in the ClinEvident registry. Originally approved for type 2 diabetes (Ozempic) and…

Grade: A+

Metformin

B-
Metabolic Rx (Repurposed) cardiovascularbrainliver

Metformin has extensive observational evidence suggesting longevity benefits, including the landmark UKPDS study showing reduced all-cause…

Grade: B-

Urolithin A (Mitopure)

C+
Musculoskeletal Supplement musculoskeletalcardiovascularimmune

Urolithin A is the cleanest evidence story in the supplement space. Timeline/Amazentis has published six human clinical trials showing…

Grade: C+

CoQ10 (Ubiquinol)

C+
Cardiology Supplement cardiovascularmusculoskeletal

CoQ10 has the longest clinical evidence history of any longevity supplement. A 2024 meta-analysis found CoQ10 supplementation significantly…

Grade: C+

Rapamycin (Sirolimus)

C
Longevity Rx (Repurposed) immunecardiovascularbrain

Rapamycin has the strongest preclinical lifespan extension data of any compound — consistent results across yeast, worms, flies, and…

Grade: C

Spermidine

C-
Longevity Supplement cardiovascularbrainimmune

Spermidine is an autophagy inducer with an interesting epidemiological signal — the Bruneck Study (n=829, 20-year follow-up) found that…

Grade: C-

NR (Nicotinamide Riboside / Tru Niagen)

C-
Longevity Supplement cardiovascularbrainliver

NR (Tru Niagen by ChromaDex) shares the NAD+ precursor mechanism with NMN but has a slightly stronger evidence base. ChromaDex has…

Grade: C-

NMN (Nicotinamide Mononucleotide)

C-
Longevity Supplement cardiovascularbrainmusculoskeletal

NMN is among the most popular longevity supplements, but its evidence grade is D+ — reflecting a significant gap between consumer…

Grade: C-

D+Q (Dasatinib + Quercetin) Senolytic

D+
Longevity Rx (Repurposed) immunelungskidneys

D+Q is the original senolytic combination, pioneered by James Kirkland at Mayo Clinic. The concept — selectively killing senescent cells…

Grade: D+

Fisetin

D+
Longevity Supplement immunebrainmusculoskeletal

Fisetin exemplifies the senolytic evidence gap. A 2018 preclinical study identified it as the most potent senolytic flavonoid, extending…

Grade: D+

Quercetin (standalone)

D+
Inflammation Supplement immunecardiovascular

Quercetin as a standalone supplement has weak evidence for longevity. Its primary interest is as the 'Q' in D+Q senolytic therapy, but…

Grade: D+

How We Grade Evidence

Every intervention is scored across six dimensions of the Evidence Grading Framework (EGF), published as the ClinEvident Evidence Grading Standard. The methodology is published. The grades are transparent. The data speaks.

1

Human Outcome Weight

Does it change hard clinical endpoints in humans? RCTs with mortality, morbidity, or functional outcomes score highest.

30%
2

Biomarker Relevance

Are the biomarkers it moves actually predictive of aging or disease? Validated surrogate endpoints vs. exploratory markers.

20%
3

Signal Source Quality

Where does the evidence come from? Peer-reviewed RCTs in NEJM vs. open-label pilot studies vs. press releases.

15%
4

Organ Specificity

How precisely does the evidence map to specific organ systems? Targeted organ data vs. whole-organism generalities.

15%
5

Interaction Certainty

How well-characterized are the interactions with other compounds? Graded at the compound-pair level.

Separate
6

Translational Maturity

How close is the evidence to clinical actionability? Phase 3 complete vs. animal-only vs. in-vitro.

20%

Cut through the noise.

Free accounts see compound overviews and grades. Subscribers get full clinical detail, dose-signal data, regulatory intelligence, and unlimited interaction checks.