First pairings are in review

Each pairing is checked against its sources before it is published here. The first set covers widely prescribed therapies such as statins, metformin, GLP-1 medicines and methotrexate.

How to read a pairing

Every pairing carries one of five evidence states. They describe what the combination evidence shows — not how good either part is on its own, which is what each intervention’s own grade measures.

Additive · documented
Trials show the combination does better than the drug alone.
Synergistic · documented
Trials show more benefit together than the two would give separately.
No benefit shown · documented
It was tested properly and added nothing. A firm “no” is as useful as a “yes”: it saves money, pills and false hope.
Antagonistic · documented
The pairing works against the drug, or causes harm — for example by blocking its absorption.
Plausible · not yet tested
There is a sound reason to expect an effect, but nobody has tested the combination yet.

Four kinds of pairing

  • Depletion — the drug lowers a nutrient (metformin and vitamin B12).
  • Countermeasure — the add-on offsets a side effect (folate with methotrexate).
  • Augmentation — the add-on is tested for extra benefit (exercise with GLP-1 therapy).
  • Conflict — the add-on interferes with the drug (calcium or iron with levothyroxine).

This page describes published evidence. It is not advice to add, stop or change anything in a prescribed treatment — talk to the prescriber or a pharmacist first. Pairings marked “In queue for final human review” were drafted with AI assistance from published sources and proofed, and are awaiting final review by a ClinEvident rater.